Home loans — buying & building Home loans overview Construction Bridging Guarantor No & low deposit Land Upgrading / next home Downsizing Second property Renovations Buying at auction Home loans — your situation Low-doc / self-employed Bad credit Debt consolidation Single parent Contract & casual FIFO & mining Expat / foreign income Divorce & separation Negative gearing SMSF property Refinance ↗ Rate types & structures Fixed rate Variable rate Split Interest-only Offset account Line of credit Business & commercial Business loans Commercial property Construction & development Equipment & asset finance Working capital Business expansion Childcare centres Private lending Securities lending Caveat loans Car & personal Car & asset finance New car Used car Luxury & prestige Electric vehicle Novated lease Chattel mortgage Personal loans Wedding Travel Payday alternative Professions Doctors & medical Accountants Lawyers Engineers IT professionals Nurses Teachers Police & emergency Real estate agents Tradies Tools & company Calculators About Contact FAQ Reviews Blog Locations Legal
Home / Blog / Investor Lending Record $42.9B
Investment Lending · 2026-04-22

Investor Lending Record $42.9B: Which Lenders Still Write 95% LVR in April 2026

Investor Lending $42.9B Record - 95% LVR Lenders Analysis

The ABS Lending Indicators release for December Quarter 2025 (published 23 February 2026) landed one of the cleanest signals we've seen in years on Australian investor lending: a record $42.9 billion quarter, up 31.8% year-on-year, across 60,455 loans at an average size of $717,000.

That's not a gentle uptick. That's investor demand back at cycle peaks — with a 4.10% cash rate, a market average variable rate above 5.74%, and an APRA 3% serviceability buffer still in place. The appetite is there. The question for most investor borrowers in April 2026 is simpler: which lender will actually write the file?

This post walks through every lender on Esteb and Co's 50-lender panel that currently supports investor home loans at 90% LVR or higher. The data comes from the lender_policies table we maintain from monthly Connective policy-matrix imports — the same data our matching engine runs against for every client file.

The record: what $42.9B means

Investor lending, Q4 2025 (quarterly record)
$42.9B
Up 31.8% YoY. Up 7.9% QoQ on value, +5.5% QoQ on loan count. Source: ABS Lending Indicators.
Investor loan count, Q4 2025
60,455
Average loan size $717,000. NSW investor loans averaged $873,000 — only state above the national average.

Two forces underneath the number. First, the rental-yield gap: Q1 2026 metro capital-city gross yields sit around 3.5–4.2%, which against mortgage rates of 6.0–6.5% looks negative on paper — but combined with depreciation, negative gearing, and capital-growth expectations, the after-tax picture still pencils for higher-income investors. Second, the "too many buyers chasing too few properties" effect — FHB demand alone drove a 6.8% quarterly rise in FHB loans, and investors are competing in the same listings.

The upshot: demand is there. Supply of lenders willing to write high-LVR investor files, on the other hand, has been getting tighter since 2023.

The LVR story: why 95% matters

LVR on an investor file does two things. It determines whether the loan needs Lenders Mortgage Insurance (below 80% LVR, no LMI; above 80%, LMI applies). And it sets the pricing tier — every additional 5% of LVR typically costs 10–30 basis points more on the interest rate.

For an investor with strong servicing but thin cash deposit, writing at 95% rather than 80% is the difference between buying now and buying in 18 months. An $800,000 investor property needs a $160,000 deposit at 80%, a $120,000 deposit at 85%, an $80,000 deposit at 90%, and $40,000 deposit at 95%. Plus LMI of roughly $10–35,000 depending on LVR and loan size.

So the question of who still writes 95% investor is really the question of who still lets investors use equity-thin positions. Here's the picture across our panel.

Investor LVR bandLenders on panel
95% or higher21
90–94%38
85–89%1
80–84%3
Below 80%1

59 of the 64 lenders where we have current policy data are at 90%+ investor LVR — so the tier is not as thin as trade press often suggests. But the ones at 95%+ cluster into two distinct camps, and knowing which camp your file fits determines everything.

Maximum investor LVR distribution — panel lenders (April 2026) Max investor LVR across our panel (n = 64 profiled lenders) The 90%+ tier holds 59 of 64 profiled lenders — narrower at 95%+. 95% or higher 21 lenders (32.8%) 90–94% 38 (59.4%) 85–89% 1 (1.6%) 80–84% 3 (4.7%) Below 80% 1 (1.6%) Source: lender_policies table, current as at 20 April 2026.
59 lenders support 90%+ investor LVR. The tier narrows to 21 at 95%+, and only 1 lender (Credit Union SA) writes 97%.

The 21 lenders at 95%+ investor LVR

Sorted by LVR, then by DTI cap, then by turnaround. All figures are current as at 20 April 2026.

LenderTypeInv LVRDTI capTurnaround
Credit Union SACredit Union97%6.5x9 days
Liberty FinancialNon-Bank95%7.5x8 days
BankwestMajor Bank95%7.0x7 days
Bank of MelbourneMajor Bank95%7.0x9 days
Commonwealth BankBig 4 Bank95%7.0x9 days
ANZBig 4 Bank95%7.0x10 days
ResimacNon-Bank95%7.0x13 days
Bank of QueenslandRegional95%7.0x14 days
Granite Home LoansNon-Bank95%7.0x14 days
Firefighters Mutual BankMutual95%6.5x9 days
MyStateMutual95%6.5x9 days
Health Professionals BankMutual95%6.5x10 days
GMCUCredit Union95%6.5x11 days
QBANKMutual95%6.5x11 days
Hejaz Financial ServicesSpecialist95%6.5x14 days
Newcastle PermanentMutual95%6.5x14 days
Queensland Country BankRegional95%6.5x14 days
Teachers Mutual BankMutual95%6.5x15 days
UniBankMutual95%6.5x17 days

Three observations:

Credit Union SA is the outlier. 97% investor LVR is the highest on panel by 200bps. It's a single-state credit union by origin (now with broader availability) but its investor policy is the sharpest for equity-thin files.

Liberty Financial is the only lender combining 95% LVR with 7.5x DTI. Every other lender at 95% caps DTI at 7.0x or 6.5x. If your investor file is income-heavy but debt-thin, Liberty's combination is unique.

Big 4 are in, but they're not market-leading. CBA and ANZ both support 95% investor LVR at 7.0x DTI — reasonable policy. Westpac and NAB are notable absences from the 95% tier (they cap at 90% investor). Bankwest (CBA-owned) and Bank of Melbourne (Westpac-owned) stay in via their subsidiary positions.

DTI caps: where 95% gets tight

Debt-to-Income ratio is where high-LVR investor files most commonly fall over. For a typical Sydney investor file with a $250k household income and $1.2m of existing debt, the DTI is 4.8x — fine everywhere. But once you add a new $800k investor loan, the DTI jumps to 8.0x — which only three lenders on our panel accept, and none of them at 95% LVR.

Here's the DTI distribution at 95%+ investor LVR:

DTI capLendersWhere they sit
7.5x1Liberty Financial
7.0x8CBA, ANZ, Bankwest, Bank of Melbourne, BoQ, Granite, Resimac
6.5x10Mutual bank group, CUSA (97%), MyState, Newcastle Permanent, QCB, Hejaz

The 6.5x cap is the binding constraint for most mutual-bank investor files. If your household DTI is sitting above 6.5x, the entire customer-owned mutual sector is closed — which means losing access to the cheapest variable rates on panel and being forced into Big 4 or non-bank pricing.

LVR × DTI matrix — investor lending lenders on our panel LVR × DTI matrix — investor lending on our panel Where each lender sits on the two hardest policy dimensions. Green = cheap. Red = expensive but flexible. DTI 8.0x none Pepper, RedZed none none DTI 7.5x none none none Liberty (unique) DTI 7.0x none NAB, ING St.George +4 AMP CBA, ANZ, Bankwest BoM, BoQ, Resimac +3 DTI 6.5x none BoC, AMP, Auswide + Bank Aust, Beyond Bank +others QCB, Newcastle P. UniBank, TMB, FMB +6 DTI 6.0x none Westpac (at 90%) some mutuals Credit Union SA 97% LVR < 80% LVR 80–89% LVR 90–94% LVR 95%+ Cheap bank / mutual — cheapest rates, tight DTI Mid-tier bank — middle pricing, Big 4-adjacent Non-bank / specialist — higher rates, flexible DTI High-DTI specialist — most expensive, but writes what others don't DTI cap → Maximum LVR → | The bottom-right cell is where most investor files land.
Where each investor-LVR tier intersects with DTI cap. Green = cheapest rates + tight DTI. Red = expensive but flexible.

High-DTI investor specialists (where 95% isn't the constraint)

If the binding constraint is DTI rather than LVR, the specialist non-banks become relevant. At 90% investor LVR, the DTI space opens up materially:

LenderInv LVRDTI capTurnaround
Pepper Money90%8.0x12 days
Pepper Money Multi-Product90%8.0x5 days
RedZed90%8.0x12 days

These three are the only lenders on our panel combining 90%+ investor LVR with an 8.0x DTI cap. Pricing reflects the risk appetite — rates typically 100–250bps above the mutual-bank tier — but for investors whose file needs both high LVR and high DTI, this is the only route.

Turnaround matters: auction-ready investor files

Investor purchases often happen at auction, where settlement timelines are fixed and unconditional-approval speed determines whether you can bid. Of the 21 lenders at 95%+ investor LVR, the fastest turnaround options are:

For auction buyers, the 2-week turnaround at UniBank, Newcastle Permanent and QCB is the constraint. The 5-day turnaround at Pepper Money Multi-Product is the fastest on panel for 90%+ LVR investor files — worth knowing if speed matters more than price.

What it means if you're writing an investor file now

If you're a first-time investor with clean credit and strong income (DTI < 6.5x): the cheapest options are mutual banks at 95% LVR. Queensland Country Bank, MyState, or the Mutual Bank Ltd divisions (Firefighters, Health Professionals, Teachers, UniBank, QBANK). You'll pay 5.64–5.84% variable vs Big 4 at 5.99–6.19%.

If you're a multi-property investor with DTI 6.5–7.0x: the Big 4 stay in — CBA and ANZ both write at 7.0x DTI at 95% LVR. Bankwest and Bank of Melbourne are cheaper alternatives at the same DTI cap.

If you're equity-strong but DTI-tight (DTI 7.0–8.0x): Liberty Financial is your 95% LVR option. If you can step down to 90% LVR, Pepper Money and RedZed open up at 8.0x DTI.

If you're buying at auction: don't bid until you have unconditional approval from a lender whose turnaround fits your settlement timeline. Bankwest at 7 days, Liberty at 8 days, or Pepper Multi-Product at 5 days are the speed options.

Frequently asked questions

What was the average investor loan size in Q4 2025?

$717,000 nationally. NSW investor loans averaged $873,000 (the only state above national average). Source: ABS Lending Indicators, December Quarter 2025.

Can I get 95% LVR on a second investment property?

Yes, but the lender pool narrows. Most 95% investor LVR lenders apply additional restrictions on files with two or more existing investment properties — including tighter DTI caps (usually 0.5x lower) and higher rental-income shading (typically 75% rather than 80%). The 21 lenders in this post are the starting pool; the actual fit for a 2nd-or-later investment file depends on your total existing-property exposure.

Why is Liberty the only 7.5x DTI lender at 95% LVR?

Liberty's product architecture differs from bank competitors — they price each file individually rather than using fixed product tiers. The 7.5x DTI at 95% LVR is a specific product configuration that only one other lender on the wider market (outside our panel) matches. See our full Liberty Financial profile for the 5-step qualifier tree.

How do rental income shading rules affect my borrowing capacity?

Lenders typically accept 75–80% of rental income toward serviceability (the shade covers vacancy, repairs, rates). A $600/week rental property thus contributes roughly $450–480/week to borrowing capacity rather than the full $600. That shade is applied BEFORE the DTI and DSR calcs — so on a tight investor file, rental shading can flip a "will write" lender into a decline.

See where you stand

Compare your options across our panel of 50 lenders in about 2 minutes. Free, and it won’t affect your credit score.

Start free assessment →

No obligation · Richard Esteb, Credit Rep #574071

Richard Esteb

Richard Esteb

Licensed Finance Broker & Founder, Esteb & Co
CREDIT REP #574071 · ACL 389328 (CONNECTIVE)

Ricky founded Esteb & Co to give everyday Australians access to the same loan comparison technology used by the big banks. He compares products from a panel of 50 lenders to find the right fit for each client’s situation.

Start free assessment →